This article mentions that evaluating a person cannot be done in one aspect only, because no one is perfect. According to the article “ I want to comment objectively on Chiang Kai-shek ”, the author mentioned that “ to comprehensively, to objectively, deeply, and correctly understand Chiang kai-shek, including Chiang kai-shek during the Anti- Japanese War, but also Chiang kai-shek in other periods, we should pay attention to the complexity of his mentality and performance, and the consistency between words and deeds ”. It shows that evaluating a person cannot be too one-sided. If he succeeds in one aspect and fails to do well on the other, it meets one’s standards.
In this article, the author mainly wrote about Chiang Kai-shek’s lack of military guidance. By the article “from Zhou Enlai’s point of view, Chiang kai-shek mailitary ability”. This information tells us that Chiang Kai-shek is not good at guiding the military, but in terms of political thought, he is very good, because he can allow many very good people to agree with him and follow his footsteps, but he cannot properly conduct military command .
ya 