I-search is difficult to write. Before writing I-search, I need to read a lot of books and papers, and then I can determine your own topic and direction. After writing, I have to modify it repeatedly. This is a long process. There are too few professional papers and no relevant knowledge reserves. Professional papers are too boring, and some papers are really not understandable after the first reading, and you need to read them repeatedly to understand. I was forced to read professional papers. Most of the time I go to the library to read literature and business books. Secondly, my heart is not quiet enough. When I think of writing I-search, the whole person is resistant. Every time before going to bed, I told myself that I must write I-search well tomorrow, and turn on the computer the next day and start playing games. I always comfort myself that I will write it right away after a while, and finally it will be gone. Only the pressure of the deadline will fill me with fighting spirit. Then there was too much interference around me. Every time the phone starts to vibrate before typing a few words, the computer’s Wechat starts to drop. I can’t help but click to see what happened, this opening, an hour passed. Later, I switched to a mobile phone and I didn’t pay attention to I-search.  Don’t like to write, just like to write some text to record your life. It’s too hard to think about writing I-search. In fact, it’s not difficult to write I-search to master the method.

My favorite is RA. In my opinion, writing RA is a process of enjoyment. Humans need to output their own opinions in order to obtain substitution and recognition; or to change the opinions of others. These behaviors may make them associate with each other is a social need. I usually have the potential for truth-seeking, and when I encounter seemingly incorrect news, I go to the information to prove it.

First, CRP needs to be written in MLA format, and secondly, paragraphs need to be in accordance with American standards. Each paragraph must have a topic sentence and conversion words. Of course, the most important thing is to comply with the CRP format, there must be an introduction, literature review, data and methods, research results, reference. Secondly, this is a group cooperation project. Each part is a team work, so this part is very important in the project.

Finally, there are many things can’t do in CRP. For example, in the part of literature review, based on each topic or resource, this part can easily become a summary. The most important part of this part is to integrate the resources found, not to simply summarize this material.

In the research process, it is necessary to write a clear research method and analyze the research results. In the course of the research, you will encounter many problems, and the results of the investigation should be screened. Some answers that do not answer the questions cannot be included in the research.

In this cooperative project, everyone needs to actively complete their part and cooperate with other team members to complete this project. When encountering problems, be sure to solve them together.

This article mentions that evaluating a person cannot be done in one aspect only, because no one is perfect. According to the article “ I want to comment objectively on Chiang Kai-shek ”, the author mentioned that “ to comprehensively, to objectively, deeply, and correctly understand Chiang kai-shek, including Chiang kai-shek during the Anti- Japanese War, but also Chiang kai-shek in other periods, we should pay attention to the complexity of his mentality and performance, and the consistency between words and deeds ”. It shows that evaluating a person cannot be too one-sided. If he succeeds in one aspect and fails to do well on the other, it meets one’s standards.

In this article, the author mainly wrote about Chiang Kai-shek’s lack of military guidance. By the article “from Zhou Enlai’s point of view, Chiang kai-shek mailitary ability”. This information tells us that Chiang Kai-shek is not good at guiding the military, but in terms of political thought, he is very good, because he can allow many very good people to agree with him and follow his footsteps, but he cannot properly conduct military command .

I use WeChat to communicate with my team members on a daily basis, and we will analyze and plan the tasks to be completed in advance. Usually we use rock-paper-scissors to assign tasks, just to be fair. When we encounter problems, we usually discuss them together in order to make the best decision. Because we are a classmate in China, we are more familiar with each other. So it will be much easier for us to communicate. There will not be any differences between us. If the concepts are different, we will listen carefully to their respective views, then analyze and decide.

Next week is Yue’s birthday. I decided to make a cake for her, because American cakes are too sweet for us, and many Chinese people cannot accept too sweet food, so I want to make one for her that is not sweet cake. In daily life, we care about each other, and if someone needs something, we will try to help. 

I think in Chinese culture, people usually do n’t praise others. If we are a group and we need to cooperate, then we are responsible for doing our part. If it is completed, we will not praise it, but if the project is won Very good results, we usually feel proud. Then we will give some praise, for example: This is the result of our concerted efforts.

Towards the end of last semester, I made an appointment with my friends to go to Universal Studios in LA next spring break next year. Because we think that spring breaks need to arrange some travel. But when I returned to NAU again, the corona virus occurred, and to this day, the transmission is very serious. As of today, there have been five cases in Arizona States. By Given the advice of teachers and parents in China, all Chinese students have decided not to go out.

Now that I have a new plan for my spring break, I check my schedule and find that I have a ten-day vacation. Because the midterm exam has ended, there is no need to review or do a lot of homework. Because I like painting very much, I think I can buy a big canvas, and I can concentrate my time on my painting. Also, I’ve been very interested in guitar recently, and I was thinking that I could buy a guitar and use the holidays for practice.

Because many arrangements will change due to urgent matters, I think I can appropriately invite my friends out for dinner, so it will be boring to not stay in the dormitory all the time. Because Flagstaff’s weather is always elusive, I was thinking that if I had time I would go out and watch a movie. When I am bored in the dormitory, I choose to listen to songs and practice calligraphy.

My teacher told me that synthesis means something that is made by combing different things, such as ideas, styles. Moreover, it is not summary, you need using experts to information your audience before you do your own research.

When I write literature review, I need to have a synthesis of research done by experts and professional. Literature review need combine all relevant ideas.

Synthesis, It is more like analyzing and interpreting a problem from various aspects, and comprehensively understanding the problem, rather than one-sided or shallow, whether it is good or bad, nor is it a summary of a feature or a central point of view. It is to summarize and summarize from all aspects. For example, why is it causing global warming? Then we can start from some human behaviors, such as destroying air quality, increasing water pollution, and destroying the ecological balance of nature. On the other hand, from the perspective of nature itself, for example, after nature is destroyed by humans, there is no way to recover in time, so as to respond to the damage we have suffered. That’s what I understand about synthesis, and I think that’s what causes a phenomenon.

For example, the topic of my CRP is a hero. What I need to discuss is the quality of this hero. For example, Chairman Mao of China, who established China as a country, but the Cultural Revolution of the Decade brought great disaster to China. Many outstanding cultural works are thus annihilated. So how do we define a hero, we need to comprehensively judge this person, not that he has done a great thing, he is a hero, and if he has done something wrong, he is not a hero.

I have some likes and dislikes about teamwork. First of all, group cooperation is very different from Chinese classes. So there will be many different feelings.

For the part I like, that is my favorite every time. The atmosphere of the group’s cooperation made me very surprised, because everyone is very willing to give you suggestions, and everyone is very careful, the suggestions given are very practical. In addition, I think that group work can help me better adapt to NAU learning.

What I don’t like in group work is a small thing. Because I got my feedback, the team members’ feedback only involved one problem, that is, my background was not detailed enough. I think this is a good suggestion, but I only get one. I hope that everyone can prepare as many suggestions as possible when preparing evaluations of others, which can help the authors to better modify their articles.

I think group cooperation can cultivate my cooperation ability and communication ability in a certain sense. The important thing for a group to cooperate is cooperation and tacit understanding.

In the United States, group discussions are very normal. In China, only when a project takes a long time and a lot of energy will it be allowed to complete with others. China focuses on the ability of the individual. One thing to look at is how capable you are as a person. Of course, there are different ways to exercise cooperation, which is more common in Chinese universities.

In RA writing, the most indispensable is to analyze the article. Each introduction of a Rhetorical element will analyze its role, and then it must be connected with the reader. This is the purpose of this article. In addition, RA needs different perspectives of the Democratic and Republican parties to analyze and learn the characteristics of American news.

There is no need to add your own opinions in the RA analysis. Instead, focus on why the author used this rhetorical element and how to persuade the reader with these rhetorical techniques. Not to analyze this article with your own point of view, nor to persuade your readers of RA with your own point of view.

In the writing of this RA, I analyzed the rhetorical techniques, and I did not add my own thoughts. But when I went to write comments to modify my article, the teacher told me that I did not associate the analysis with the reader, so I did not associate with the thesis of the article, and did not echo the article.

Of course, I also think that my analysis is not comprehensive enough, such as analyzing a rhetorical technique. I should pay attention to why the author uses this rhetorical technique to really convince the reader.

Through this writing, I found that I have learned how to use rhetoric to persuade my readers. Even though my views are often biased, I can still use some rhetorical techniques to make my article look very valid.

I think bias has the biggest impact on me, because I never knew that bias had such a big impact on a person.

Different people have different forms of thinking, different widths and different depths lead to people not being able to squarely think of themselves as “foreign species”; some people can deal with different ideas softly, while others are persistent and persistent I think. Jet lag: The impact between traditional and modern culture. Under the influence of different times, the information received is also unbalanced. Time is an insurmountable gap. Prejudice is also a product of it. Geographical difference: the contradiction between foreign and indigenous cultures, even in the same country, people in different regions have a set of inherent thinking (traditional) culture, which leads to the incomprehension of certain “imported” things and even to attack Of it. Height difference: Collisions between different heights are prone to accidents, and different cultural classes lead to different views on the same thing, but the two arguments are difficult to convince each other. In the final analysis, prejudice is actually a kind of thought. Everyone has the right to think and have the right to speak for his own thoughts. All of this has nothing to do with the living environment and his own qualifications. All people are created equal. Prejudice is reasonable and unacceptable, but requires understanding.

 I learned from a Weibo sharer that the topic is the ten most famous paradoxes in the world, and I am most interested in the tram problem. The Trolley Problem-one of the most well-known thought experiments in ethics Content: A lunatic tied five innocent people to a tramway. An out-of-control tram came towards them and was crushed to them a moment later. Fortunately, you can pull a lever to get the tram to another track. But there is another problem. The lunatic also tied a person on that other track. Considering the above situation, should you pull the lever? Interpretation: The tram problem was first proposed by the philosopher PhilippaFoot to criticize the main theories in ethical philosophy, especially utilitarianism. The point put forward by utilitarianism is that most ethical decisions are made on the principle of “providing the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people.” From a utilitarian point of view, the obvious choice should be to pull the lever, saving five people and killing only one. But utilitarian critics believe that once you pull the lever, you become an accomplice of immoral behavior-you are partially responsible for the death of a single person on another track. However, others believe that in this situation you are required to do something, and your inaction will be equally immoral. In short, there is no complete ethical behavior, and this is the point. Many philosophers use the tram puzzle as an example to show that real-life conditions often force a person to violate his own moral code, and there are situations where there is no complete moral practice.